Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wish: make 'break at function' work as good as 'break at line' #3390

Closed
vicuna opened this issue Jun 13, 2002 · 1 comment
Closed

Wish: make 'break at function' work as good as 'break at line' #3390

vicuna opened this issue Jun 13, 2002 · 1 comment

Comments

@vicuna
Copy link

vicuna commented Jun 13, 2002

Original bug ID: 1198
Reporter: administrator
Status: acknowledged
Resolution: open
Priority: normal
Severity: feature
Category: tools (ocaml{lex,yacc,dep,debug,...})

Bug description

Full_Name: mattias waldau
Version: 3.04+13
OS: Mandrake 8.2
Submission from: h175n2fls34o849.telia.com (217.208.235.175)

I always use break at line, since break at function only works
if program initialized.

If this is not fixed, maybe add as a trick to the manual

In the following example, I can set a break point using the line
number, but not using the function name.

(ocd) set arg lookup_only.pl
(ocd) break Intermediate.warn_if_not_ordered
Loading program... done.
The module path Intermediate is not yet initialized.
Please run program forward until its initialization code is executed.
(ocd) break @ Intermediate 76
Breakpoint 1 at 222696 : file Intermediate, line 76 column 3
(ocd)

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been open one year with no activity. Consequently, it is being marked with the "stale" label. What this means is that the issue will be automatically closed in 30 days unless more comments are added or the "stale" label is removed. Comments that provide new information on the issue are especially welcome: is it still reproducible? did it appear in other contexts? how critical is it? etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant