Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Native-code compilation on sparc64-GNU/Linux-debian #3845

Closed
vicuna opened this issue Oct 4, 2002 · 1 comment
Closed

Native-code compilation on sparc64-GNU/Linux-debian #3845

vicuna opened this issue Oct 4, 2002 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@vicuna
Copy link

vicuna commented Oct 4, 2002

Original bug ID: 1416
Reporter: administrator
Status: closed
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: minor
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)

Bug description

Full_Name: Samuel Colin
Version: 3.06
OS: GNU/Linux debian woody 3.0r0
Submission from: carene.inrets.fr (137.121.1.8)

Hello,
I simply report a "missing feature" in compilation of OCaml on sparc64.
The ./configure phase tells that native-code compilation is not supported,
whereas in fact it is, but in a 32-bit userland.
Further description:
"uname -a" reports "sparc64"
The configure script knows about sparc, but not sparc64, so native-code
compilation is reported as not supported.
Setting up an environment variable (FAKE_SPARC) to "yes" makes "uname -a" report
"sparc", and then the configure script reports it can compile natively.
The obtained executables are flawlessly working, as the userland is 32-bit.
Moreover, the ./configure detects the ability to do 64-bits optimizations, as
the machine (an ultra 5) is 64-bits.
So, I propose two solutions : add sparc64 in the list of supported
architectures, or when sparc64 is detected, replace it by sparc (at least under
a gnu/linux OS).

@vicuna
Copy link
Author

vicuna commented Jan 3, 2003

Comment author: administrator

Hopefully, fixed on 2003-01-03 by XL & DD.

@vicuna vicuna closed this as completed Jan 3, 2003
@vicuna vicuna added the bug label Mar 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant