You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 1564 Reporter: administrator Status: closed Resolution: fixed Priority: normal Severity: minor Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
It is mentioned in passing in the "Method definition" section of
.../manual017.html, but I think that was meant to be a restatement of
productions already present in expr, not an addition of new
productions. For example, the copy-with-instance-variable-assignment
expression (such as <x = 3; y = "x">) is also mentioned in the "Method
definition" section, and that does appear in the definition of "expr".
--
Tim Freeman tim@fungible.com
GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original bug ID: 1564
Reporter: administrator
Status: closed
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: minor
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
In the grammar for "expr" at
http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/htmlman/manual015.html, the production for
setting the value of an instance variable is missing.
It is mentioned in passing in the "Method definition" section of
.../manual017.html, but I think that was meant to be a restatement of
productions already present in expr, not an addition of new
productions. For example, the copy-with-instance-variable-assignment
expression (such as <x = 3; y = "x">) is also mentioned in the "Method
definition" section, and that does appear in the definition of "expr".
--
Tim Freeman
tim@fungible.com
GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: