You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 1600 Reporter: administrator Status: closed Resolution: fixed Priority: normal Severity: minor Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
I think "mod" should included as a case for the "infix-op" grammar
production in
and infix-op should be moved to manual011.html and the "operator-name"
production should be rewritten to
operator-name ::= prefix-symbol | infix-op
If you don't want to redefine operator-name, you'll have to add "mod"
to the list of special cases for operator-name too, so "(mod)" is then
a valid expression.
Tim Freeman tim@fungible.com
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original bug ID: 1600
Reporter: administrator
Status: closed
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: minor
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
I think "mod" should included as a case for the "infix-op" grammar
production in
http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/htmlman/manual015.html
and infix-op should be moved to manual011.html and the "operator-name"
production should be rewritten to
operator-name ::= prefix-symbol | infix-op
If you don't want to redefine operator-name, you'll have to add "mod"
to the list of special cases for operator-name too, so "(mod)" is then
a valid expression.
Tim Freeman tim@fungible.com
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: