| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-05-24 06:19 CEST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
| 0001691 | OCaml | OCaml general | public | 2003-05-16 02:29 | 2008-01-22 14:17 | |||
| Reporter | administrator | |||||||
| Assigned To | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always | |||
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||||
| Product Version | ||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 3.09.0 | ||||||
| Summary | 0001691: warning for unused variable bindings? | |||||||
| Description | Full_Name: Wheeler Ruml Version: 3.06 OS: linux and mingw Submission from: katsura.parc.xerox.com (13.2.18.21) Tiny suggestion: how about an optional warning for variables that are bound but never used elsewhere? For me, at least, this often signals a programming error (analogous to implicitly ignoring a return value). Perhaps this would apply only to bindings inside another let, but looking at the .cmi should allow one to tell whether a toplevel binding could possibly be used by another module. Just a thought. Thanks for some great software! Wheeler | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2005-11-18 10:13 | administrator | New Issue | |
| 2008-01-22 14:17 | doligez | Status | acknowledged => closed |
| 2008-01-22 14:17 | doligez | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2008-01-22 14:17 | doligez | Fixed in Version | => 3.09.0 |
| 2008-01-22 14:17 | doligez | Description Updated | |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |