You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 1857 Reporter: administrator Status: closed Resolution: fixed Priority: normal Severity: minor Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
Full_Name: John Skaller
Version: 3.07beta
OS: na
Submission from: proxy3.tpgi.com.au (203.26.24.213)
Ocamllex documentation, minor detail only:
12.2 says:
rule entrypoint [arg1... argn] =
(note the optional arguments .. )
But 12.2.5 just says:
entrypoint lexbuf
(Where entrypoint is the name of another entry point in the same lexer
definition.) Recursively call the lexer on the given entry point. Useful for
lexing nested comments, for example.
ignoring the possibility of optional arguments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Full_Name: John Skaller
Version: 3.07beta
OS: na
Submission from: proxy3.tpgi.com.au (203.26.24.213)
Ocamllex documentation, minor detail only:
12.2 says:
rule entrypoint [arg1... argn] =
(note the optional arguments .. )
But 12.2.5 just says:
entrypoint lexbuf
(Where entrypoint is the name of another entry point in the same lexer
definition.) Recursively call the lexer on the given entry point. Useful for
lexing nested comments, for example.
Original bug ID: 1857
Reporter: administrator
Status: closed
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: minor
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
Full_Name: John Skaller
Version: 3.07beta
OS: na
Submission from: proxy3.tpgi.com.au (203.26.24.213)
Ocamllex documentation, minor detail only:
12.2 says:
rule entrypoint [arg1... argn] =
(note the optional arguments .. )
But 12.2.5 just says:
entrypoint lexbuf
(Where entrypoint is the name of another entry point in the same lexer
definition.) Recursively call the lexer on the given entry point. Useful for
lexing nested comments, for example.
ignoring the possibility of optional arguments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: