| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-05-24 02:20 CEST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||
| 0003012 | OCaml | OCaml general | public | 2004-07-28 06:31 | 2004-08-06 14:57 | ||||||
| Reporter | administrator | ||||||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always | ||||||
| Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | ||||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||
| Summary | 0003012: hiding module type items | ||||||||||
| Description | Full_Name: Evgeny Chukreev Version: OS: Submission from: host134.t3n.sotline.ru (81.1.200.134) What about 'without' constraint? It lets to avoid many annoying copy&past issues. # module type A = sig type t1 type t2 [...] type tN val1 : [...] val2 : [...] [...] valN : [...] module m1 : [...] module m2 : [...] [...] module mN : [...] module mt1 = [...] module mt2 = [...] [...] module mtN = [...] end # module type B = A without val val2 without type t2 without module m2 without module type m2 module type B = sig type t1 type t3 [...] type tN val1 : [...] val3 : [...] [...] valN : [...] module m1 : [...] module m3 : [...] [...] module mN : [...] module mt1 = [...] module mt3 = [...] [...] module mtN = [...] end While excluding of 'value' is easy to implement, there are should be cchecks for item dependecies inside original module type. | ||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2005-11-18 10:13 | administrator | New Issue | |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |