|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2015-03-03 23:41 CET|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap|
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0004541||OCaml||OCaml general||public||2008-04-24 19:03||2010-04-20 17:46|
|Platform||x86||OS||Ubuntu Linux||OS Version||7.10|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version||3.12.0+dev|
|Summary||0004541: Crash when debugging a program that calls Unix.fork()|
|Description||When debugging a bytecode program that calls Unix.fork(), ocamlrun|
and ocamldebug usually crash immediately after the fork operation.
1. Create a program called "test.ml", containing the following:
let _ =
Printf.printf "process %n starting\n" (Unix.getpid ());
let _ = Unix.fork () in
Printf.printf "process %n ending\n" (Unix.getpid ());
2. Compile the program:
"ocamlc -custom -g unix.cma test.ml -o test.exe".
3. Start the debugger, specifying the location of "unix.ml" and an
"ocamldebug -I <path-to-unix> -s <socket-name> test.exe"
4. Issue the following commands to ocamldebug:
"set loadingmode manual"
5. Manually load the program (possibly on another machine):
6. Repeatedly issue the "step" command to ocamldebug.
At the point just after the call to Unix.fork(), ocamldebug usually
terminates with an error message of the form:
(ocd) Garbage data from process <n>
>> Fatal error: Debugcom.do_go
Uncaught exception: Misc.Fatal_error
Ocamlrun usually also terminates itself at this point.
This appears to be happening because ocamldebug is receiving unexpected
data from ocamlrun, presumably because the forked ocamlrun processes are
competing with one another to send data along the same connection to
Occasionally, though, ocamldebug doesn't crash, but continues to report
data from both parent and child ocamlrun processes. Issuing further step
commands to ocamldebug causes the forked processes to repond in a round-
robin style. Presumably this is because the forked ocamlrun processes
are still competing with one another to read data from the same shared
connection to ocamlbug, and are picking up commands alternately, one
after the other.
The current behaviour is making it difficult for us to debug programs
that launch other processes using the traditional "fork-exec" sequence,
since debugged programs have a very good chance of crashing immediately
after they call Unix.fork().
I'm wondering, is it possible to make ocamlrun aware of Unix.fork(),
so that a child ocamlrun process doesn't attempt to communicate with
ocamldebug through the same socket as its parent process?
Thanks for your help
Citrix Systems Research & Development
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|Attached Files||fork.patch [^] (7,723 bytes) 2009-10-21 00:33 [Show Content]|
I've been playing around with ocamldebug support for fork a bit, and I'll attach a patch shortly. It works by closing the connection to one of the processes, and it includes a gdb-like option to pick whether to follow the parent or child process. One small wart is that I've added a stub implementation of the debugging functions to the native code runtime; another option would be to build two versions of the unix library.
The patch was made against 3.11.1, but applies to the trunk version too.
|I'm integrating the patch into the trunk. It will be in 3.12.0.|
|2008-04-24 19:03||jsk||New Issue|
|2008-08-04 16:47||doligez||Status||new => acknowledged|
|2009-10-21 00:32||bacam||Note Added: 0005141|
|2009-10-21 00:33||bacam||File Added: fork.patch|
|2010-04-20 17:32||doligez||Note Added: 0005355|
|2010-04-20 17:46||doligez||Status||acknowledged => closed|
|2010-04-20 17:46||doligez||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2010-04-20 17:46||doligez||Fixed in Version||=> 3.12.0+dev|
|Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group|