| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-05-20 03:49 CEST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
| 0004708 | OCaml | OCamldoc | public | 2009-02-04 10:15 | 2009-03-12 19:21 | |||
| Reporter | guillaum | |||||||
| Assigned To | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | |||
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||||
| Product Version | 3.11.0 | |||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 3.11.1+dev | ||||||
| Summary | 0004708: cannot guess from doc if a binary function is infix or not | |||||||
| Description | In the documentation of the Pervasives module (http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/libref/Pervasives.html [^]), the types of the infix binary functions (like "lor") are val lor : int -> int -> int I guess that it should be: val ( lor ) : int -> int -> int | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||
Notes |
|
|
(0004853) doligez (manager) 2009-03-12 19:21 |
This is actually a bug in ocamldoc. It will be fixed in 3.11.1. The documentation won't be fixed before 3.12.0, but the only exceptions are the following: or mod land lor lxor lsl lsr asr |
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-02-04 10:15 | guillaum | New Issue | |
| 2009-03-12 19:21 | doligez | Note Added: 0004853 | |
| 2009-03-12 19:21 | doligez | Severity | text => minor |
| 2009-03-12 19:21 | doligez | Reproducibility | N/A => always |
| 2009-03-12 19:21 | doligez | Status | new => closed |
| 2009-03-12 19:21 | doligez | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2009-03-12 19:21 | doligez | Category | OCaml documentation => OCamldoc |
| 2009-03-12 19:21 | doligez | Fixed in Version | => 3.11.1+dev |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |