| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-05-22 19:32 CEST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||
| 0004743 | OCaml | OCaml documentation | public | 2009-03-12 00:25 | 2012-09-17 15:11 | ||||||
| Reporter | frisch | ||||||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A | ||||||
| Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | ||||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||||
| Target Version | 4.00.2+dev | Fixed in Version | |||||||||
| Summary | 0004743: About generational global roots in the manual | ||||||||||
| Description | 1. Chapter 18 mentions the new functions caml_register_generational_global_root and caml_remove_generational_global_root, but not caml_modify_generational_global_root. Moreover, the sentence "The garbage collector takes advantage of the guarantee that v is not modified to scan it less often." leads to believe that generational global roots are really immutable. 2. My understanding is that the new interface is always more efficient for immutable value. However, assignment (through caml_modify_generational_global_root) can make the new interface slower than the old one, although the slowdown would usually be negligible. Is this correct? In which cases should we keep using the old interface instead of the new one? | ||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-03-12 00:25 | frisch | New Issue | |
| 2009-04-29 15:38 | doligez | Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2012-07-11 14:56 | doligez | Target Version | => 4.01.0+dev |
| 2012-07-31 13:36 | doligez | Target Version | 4.01.0+dev => 4.00.1+dev |
| 2012-09-17 13:49 | doligez | Target Version | 4.00.1+dev => 4.00.2+dev |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |