| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-06-19 15:47 CEST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||
| 0004748 | OCaml | OCaml standard library | public | 2009-03-18 14:48 | 2012-09-17 13:53 | ||||||
| Reporter | Christophe Troestler | ||||||||||
| Assigned To | |||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||||||
| Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | ||||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||
| Product Version | 3.11.0 | ||||||||||
| Target Version | 4.01.0+dev | Fixed in Version | |||||||||
| Summary | 0004748: Complex +-0. | ||||||||||
| Description | This is related to bug 0001817 albeit not fitting the description, thus I open a new issue. # Complex.mul Complex.one {Complex.re=(-1.); Complex.im = 0.0};; - : Complex.t = {Complex.re = -1.; Complex.im = 0.} # Complex.div Complex.one {Complex.re=(-1.); Complex.im = 0.0};; - : Complex.t = {Complex.re = -1.; Complex.im = -0.} (note the sign of the imaginary part). I believe the second is correct while the first one should return {Complex.re = -1.; Complex.im = -0.}. | ||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||
Relationships |
||||||
|
||||||
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-03-18 14:48 | Christophe Troestler | New Issue | |
| 2009-04-29 15:42 | doligez | Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2009-08-19 14:59 | xclerc | Relationship added | related to 0001817 |
| 2012-06-21 20:13 | frisch | Category | OCaml general => OCaml standard library |
| 2012-07-11 14:55 | doligez | Target Version | => 4.01.0+dev |
| 2012-07-31 13:36 | doligez | Target Version | 4.01.0+dev => 4.00.1+dev |
| 2012-09-17 13:53 | doligez | Target Version | 4.00.1+dev => 4.01.0+dev |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |