|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2013-12-09 13:47 CET|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap|
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0005109||OCaml||OCaml general||public||2010-07-19 19:28||2012-03-24 15:01|
|Product Version||3.12.0+beta1 or 3.12.0+rc1|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version||3.12.1+dev|
|Summary||0005109: Segmentation fault with a program compiled by OCaml 3.11.1, 3.11.2, 3.12.0beta1 (bytecode, native, Linux AMD64 and MacOS X)|
|Description||Dear OCaml developers,|
The code contained in the tar file available at
produces a deterministic segmentation fault.
It can be reproduced using:
I tried to recompile OCaml 3.11.1 with #define DEBUG added in byterun/gc_ctrl.c but the heap consistency checks are ok.
Using ocamldebug a backtrace is available and seems to indicate that the call to Cil_const.CurrentLoc fails.
Strangely if one removes the line 63 of cil/src/cil_const.ml the bug disappears.
Do not hesitate to ask for more advanced tests from me.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|Attached Files||restore_lval.diff [^] (678 bytes) 2010-12-06 10:30 [Show Content]|
Sorry: the correct link is
Pascal Cuoq (reporter)
|Note: all references to Obj functions have been erased from this "stripped" reproduction case. There are references to Obj.t, but the expressions that take these types are all "raise exn;"|
insert in line 1372 (before doFunctionDef)
Printf.printf "parser %d %d %d\n%!" (Obj.magic (fst3 $2) : int) (Obj.magic (snd3 $2) : int) (Obj.magic (trd3 $2) : int);
$ bin/toplevel.byte bug.c | grep parser
parser 70006161577636 70006161585852 0
Format.printf "%a@." d_cabsloc (trd3 $2);
will crash right there in the parser
I'm impressed! How did you track this behavior?
If I understand correctly this looks like a bug of ocamlyacc: the representation of the value returned by Parsing.peek_val does not match the type it gets.
The key is to note that v passed to CurrentLoc.set is bad (reason of a crash). Than trace it back to the point of origin with grep+sed+printf (or better camlp4 :)
(trd3 $2) corresponds to RBRACE, but ocamllex emits correct value, so indeed it seems like the bug in ocamlyacc, hard to believe though..
Julien Signoles (reporter)
The above link does not work anymore :-(.
See http://bts.frama-c.com/view.php?id=626 [^] for an easy way to reproduce something which looks like the very same bug (but with an unstripped Frama-C version which contains references to Obj, sorry OCaml Folks).
|Benjamin, I'm wondering whether you can still reproduce the bug on your linux machine. if so, please email me at email@example.com ... i might be able to help debug.|
A more or less minimal code (with only the two parsers and lexers for C and ACSL) that reproduces the issue is at
just type make to build it and run the test case
It seems that there is somehow an interference between Cparser and Logic_parser, which causes in the end Cparser to get a null pointer instead of the real CODE_ANNOT.
Note that there is no segfault anymore, as the program does not do anything with the value, still, we shouldn't get as output
In parser, annot is 0,
|There are two parsers used recursively (i.e. cparser calls clexer which calls logic_parser). IIUC this is not supported by ocamlyacc - see `let env = ` in stdlib/parsing.ml - so either coalesce the parsers or use menhir..|
The repro case works, thanks. In response to ygrek: It is true that the Parsing module has some global state, but it tries to support nested parsers nonetheless (see function Parsing.yyparse). This said, the bug might very well be in this support for reentrancy.
|Looks like restoring env.lval solves this issue|
Thanks for the "restore_lval" patch, which I applied in the 3.12 bugfix branch. It will go in release 3.12.1.
For the record: the original code in Parsing envisioned the case where a parser is called from a semantic action of another parser, but not the case where a parser is called from the lexer of another parser, as in the case in the Frama-C example. In the former case, env.lval is irrelevant, but in the latter case, it is necessary to preserve its value.
|2010-07-19 19:28||monate||New Issue|
|2010-07-20 09:10||ygrek||Note Added: 0005609|
|2010-07-20 09:55||monate||Note Added: 0005610|
|2010-07-21 13:01||Pascal Cuoq||Note Added: 0005611|
|2010-07-21 18:46||ygrek||Note Added: 0005612|
|2010-07-21 19:08||monate||Note Added: 0005613|
|2010-07-22 17:08||ygrek||Note Added: 0005615|
|2010-11-24 15:31||Julien Signoles||Note Added: 0005714|
|2010-11-24 19:13||phillyg||Note Added: 0005716|
|2010-11-26 19:34||prevosto||Note Added: 0005720|
|2010-11-30 11:47||ygrek||Note Added: 0005726|
|2010-12-01 13:37||xleroy||Note Added: 0005727|
|2010-12-01 13:37||xleroy||Status||new => acknowledged|
|2010-12-06 10:30||ygrek||File Added: restore_lval.diff|
|2010-12-06 10:35||ygrek||Note Added: 0005728|
|2010-12-22 14:09||xleroy||Note Added: 0005749|
|2010-12-22 14:09||xleroy||Status||acknowledged => resolved|
|2010-12-22 14:09||xleroy||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2010-12-22 14:09||xleroy||Fixed in Version||=> 3.12.1+dev|
|2010-12-22 14:11||xleroy||Assigned To||=> xleroy|
|2012-03-24 15:01||xleroy||Status||resolved => closed|
|Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group|