|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2014-07-26 17:10 CEST|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap|
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0005429||OCaml||OCaml general||public||2011-12-15 11:11||2014-05-25 20:20|
|Platform||PC||OS||Windows||OS Version||XP SP3 32 bits|
|Target Version||4.02.0+dev||Fixed in Version|
|Summary||0005429: Unix.stat behaves differently on win32 and linux|
|Description||The following snippet will fail with ENOENT on win32/msvc but succeed on linux.|
let () =
Unix.mkdir "somedir" 0o755;
ignore (Unix.stat "somedir");
(* Will fail on win32/msvc *)
ignore (Unix.stat "somedir/");
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|Attached Files||win32_valid_paths_follow_strange_rules_indeed.ml [^] (1,411 bytes) 2011-12-21 16:04 [Show Content]|
I'm not sure I understand why this is a bug. "somedir/" is a legal path on Unix (which is generally lenient regarding trailing directory separators), while it does not on Windows.
I don't see what other behavior you could hope with this. If you want your code to be robust, you must not use hardcoded separators but Filename.concat or Filename.dir_sep:
Could you be more explicit in what behavior you expect?
I think it depends of the intended goal of the Unix library.
If it is to stay as close to unix semantics as possible, then it should be fixed.
If it is to provide the thinnest layer possible, then maybe it should not.
In the light of all the work done to correctly handle file, pipes and sockets on Windows, it seems to me that unix semantics is the goal, hence this bug.
As a side note, ruby 1.8.2 handles this case gracefully.
|Also, I stumbled upon this while porting some OCaml software on win32/msvc. Had it been in my code, I would have worked around it.|
|Python 2.7.2 also handles this case gracefully.|
It's the usual discussion: as you start implementing workarounds like this, you become part of the problem, and not part of the solution. Encouraging people to write unix paths with the expectation that it will work out-of-the-box on Win32 is, imho, not a good thing.
What kind of solution do you suggest? Parsing a path as a unix-one under windows just to remove the trailing slash sounds like quite the hack...
edited on: 2011-12-21 16:07
Regarding portability between win32 and posix, I'm sure most would agree that python, and to a lesser extent ruby, do a decent job.
They do work around the issue, simply because in their eyes it makes sense as "systems programming languages" (whatever that means). If they didn't then they would have the same issues we face now.
I glanced at their sources and here is how they do it:
* python doesn't use the C runtime and goes straight to the win32 api (CreateFile + GetFileInformationByHandle) which also allows them to follow ntfs links when appropriate (stat vs lstat).
* ruby doesn't use the C runtime either: it duplicates the path, replaces all slashes with backslashes and isolates 3 cases: UNC paths (\\127.0.0.1\myshare\mysubdir), drive roots (c:\) and neither. Depending on the case, it may append a '.' to the path, remove a trailing '\' or leave it as is before calling FindFirstFile (with GetFileAttributes as a fallback).
|It certainly is more complicated than I originally thought...|
|2011-12-15 11:11||ripoche||New Issue|
|2011-12-15 11:15||gasche||Note Added: 0006308|
|2011-12-15 11:15||gasche||Assigned To||=> gasche|
|2011-12-15 11:15||gasche||Status||new => feedback|
|2011-12-15 11:41||ripoche||Note Added: 0006311|
|2011-12-15 11:41||ripoche||Status||feedback => assigned|
|2011-12-15 11:45||ripoche||Note Added: 0006312|
|2011-12-15 11:52||gasche||Assigned To||gasche =>|
|2011-12-15 11:52||gasche||Status||assigned => acknowledged|
|2011-12-15 11:53||ripoche||Note Added: 0006313|
|2011-12-15 11:55||gasche||Relationship added||related to 0004549|
|2011-12-21 11:29||protz||Note Added: 0006431|
|2011-12-21 15:52||ripoche||Note Added: 0006462|
|2011-12-21 16:04||ripoche||File Added: win32_valid_paths_follow_strange_rules_indeed.ml|
|2011-12-21 16:04||ripoche||Note Added: 0006463|
|2011-12-21 16:06||ripoche||Note Edited: 0006462||View Revisions|
|2011-12-21 16:07||ripoche||Note Edited: 0006462||View Revisions|
|2012-07-10 11:50||doligez||Target Version||=> 4.01.0+dev|
|2012-07-11 16:16||doligez||Relationship added||has duplicate 0004159|
|2012-07-31 13:36||doligez||Target Version||4.01.0+dev => 4.00.1+dev|
|2012-09-14 23:46||doligez||Target Version||4.00.1+dev => 4.01.0+dev|
|2013-07-29 14:33||doligez||Target Version||4.01.0+dev => 4.01.1+dev|
|2014-05-25 20:20||doligez||Target Version||4.01.1+dev => 4.02.0+dev|
|Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group|