| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2013-05-25 23:39 CEST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
| 0005504 | OCaml | OCaml general | public | 2012-02-10 11:54 | 2012-02-19 21:13 | |||||||
| Reporter | glondu | |||||||||||
| Assigned To | meyer | |||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | |||||||
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | |||||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||||||||
| Product Version | ||||||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 3.13.0+dev | ||||||||||
| Summary | 0005504: Please consider stopping using keyword substitutions | |||||||||||
| Description | They uselessly clutter diffs against release tarballs, making reviewing more difficult for almost no benefit. They can also lead to errors such as committing unwanted changes. See the attached patch (against 3.12 branch) for an example. | |||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||||||
Notes |
|
|
(0006941) meyer (developer) 2012-02-19 18:32 |
Thanks for reporting that. Similar patch applied with SVN r12170. |
|
(0006944) frisch (developer) 2012-02-19 19:38 edited on: 2012-02-19 19:39 |
My understanding was that the attached diff is an example of a diff cluttered by keyword expansions, not a patch to be applied. The solution would rather be to remove all the lines with SVN keywords from the sources. Stéphane: is it indeed what you mean? |
|
(0006945) meyer (developer) 2012-02-19 20:40 |
Yes, probably my misunderstanding, as the keywords don't get expanded in git. So, yes, I understood that the patch is just an example, and we should remove all the $Id$ instead, however I observed that they don't get expanded anyway, in my git svn repo, so I just replaced the ones that were comited by incident. I was just about to send the e-mail to the mailing list with the query what shall we do with it, as the keyword expansions is pretty useless now days. |
|
(0006946) glondu (reporter) 2012-02-19 21:13 |
> Stéphane: is it indeed what you mean? It is indeed. > I observed that they don't get expanded anyway, in my git svn repo I use git-svn too. But keywords are expanded in the tarballs that are released, and this is what I'm complaining about. |
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2012-02-10 11:54 | glondu | New Issue | |
| 2012-02-10 11:54 | glondu | File Added: 0001-Reset-svn-keywords.patch | |
| 2012-02-15 08:56 | gasche | Status | new => confirmed |
| 2012-02-19 18:20 | meyer | Assigned To | => meyer |
| 2012-02-19 18:20 | meyer | Status | confirmed => assigned |
| 2012-02-19 18:32 | meyer | Note Added: 0006941 | |
| 2012-02-19 18:32 | meyer | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2012-02-19 18:32 | meyer | Fixed in Version | => 3.13.0+dev |
| 2012-02-19 18:32 | meyer | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2012-02-19 19:38 | frisch | Note Added: 0006944 | |
| 2012-02-19 19:39 | frisch | Note Edited: 0006944 | View Revisions |
| 2012-02-19 20:40 | meyer | Note Added: 0006945 | |
| 2012-02-19 21:13 | glondu | Note Added: 0006946 | |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |