|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2016-02-10 23:09 CET|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap|
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0006406||OCaml||OCaml runtime system||public||2014-05-08 20:14||2014-07-21 22:40|
|Priority||normal||Severity||minor||Reproducibility||have not tried|
|Target Version||4.02.0+dev||Fixed in Version||4.02.0+dev|
|Summary||0006406: Expose OCaml version in C headers|
|Description||I was specifically bitten by this commit: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/commit/05100e5#diff-f940572c32e55a7e40e7f693deea4c7bR42 [^]|
Which changed, as far as I understand, a documented public API in an incompatible way between minor versions. This is horrible on its own, but the fact that there is no way to detect OCaml version in the C code to disambiguate makes it also impossible to work around.
|Attached Files||patch.6406 [^] (2,193 bytes) 2014-06-19 21:41|
> caml_alloc(n, t) returns a fresh block of size n with tag t.
> If t is less than No_scan_tag, then the fields of the block
> are initialized with a valid value in order to satisfy
> the GC constraints.
Which "valid value" is used is not specified in the documentation, so I don't think it was correct to rely on a precise choice of initialization value in the first place.
Could you explain the ctypes use-case? I had a glimpse of the discussion but that was quite cryptic to someone not familiar with the implementation.
You do have a point. Still, the rest of my argument stands.
The idea is that an OCaml callback fills some parts of an Obj.t array, and leaves some intact. The C code would then detect filled-in parts.
I agree with Gabriel. I'm not sure it's a good idea to rely on which particular initializer is used.
Exposing a version string seems sensible.
A string is nearly impossible to perform comparisons on; how about OCAML_MAJOR OCAML_MINOR OCAML_PATCH, and in addition OCAML_VERSION that has the previous concatenated. That's how I usually seen it done.
E.g. for 3.12:
OCAML_MAJOR = 3
OCAML_MINOR = 12
OCAML_PATCH = 00
OCAML_VERSION = 31200L
OCAML_MAJOR = 4
OCAML_MINOR = 01
OCAML_PATCH = 00
OCAML_VERSION = 40100L
This way you have both conveniently separated version parts and a way to compare them... e.g. #if OCAML_VERSION >= 40200L
|A good idea, but isn't it overkill to make it a long int? I doubt we'll ever reach OCaml version 400000.00.0|
|Hm, I think I cargo-culted the L suffix from the C-internal definitions, where you have conditions like "#if __STDC_VERSION__ > 199900L". Not sure whether it's actually needed or it's some obscure leftover.|
|I try to complete this issue with: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/72 [^]|
I want to change a few things before I apply this patch or the github one.
Do you have a strong preference for the format of the OCAML_VERSION integer (i.e. decimal as here or binary as in the github patch)? I'd rather use decimal.
|Definitely decimal. Versions are in decimal, after all, it's just a form of fixed point. Also, I've never ever seen version constants in hex.|
|It is done at your convenience. :)|
Patch modified and applied in 4.02 (commit 15016) and trunk (commit 15017).
|2014-05-08 20:14||whitequark||New Issue|
|2014-05-08 23:13||gasche||Note Added: 0011410|
|2014-05-08 23:21||whitequark||Note Added: 0011411|
|2014-05-09 12:48||shinwell||Note Added: 0011414|
|2014-05-09 13:06||whitequark||Note Added: 0011415|
|2014-05-09 14:42||gasche||Status||new => acknowledged|
|2014-05-16 18:02||doligez||Note Added: 0011499|
|2014-05-16 18:04||whitequark||Note Added: 0011500|
|2014-06-19 17:56||gasche||Tag Attached: junior_job|
|2014-06-19 21:35||dinosaure||Note Added: 0011760|
|2014-06-19 21:41||dinosaure||File Added: patch.6406|
|2014-07-16 17:06||doligez||Tag Attached: patch|
|2014-07-16 17:13||doligez||Note Added: 0011856|
|2014-07-16 17:13||doligez||Status||acknowledged => feedback|
|2014-07-16 17:13||doligez||Target Version||=> 4.02.0+dev|
|2014-07-16 17:18||whitequark||Note Added: 0011857|
|2014-07-16 17:18||whitequark||Status||feedback => new|
|2014-07-17 12:27||shinwell||Assigned To||=> doligez|
|2014-07-17 12:27||shinwell||Status||new => assigned|
|2014-07-17 13:32||dinosaure||Note Added: 0011877|
|2014-07-21 22:40||doligez||Note Added: 0011895|
|2014-07-21 22:40||doligez||Status||assigned => closed|
|2014-07-21 22:40||doligez||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2014-07-21 22:40||doligez||Fixed in Version||=> 4.02.0+dev|
|Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group|