Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not a bug, but... #3105

Closed
vicuna opened this issue Dec 25, 2001 · 0 comments
Closed

Not a bug, but... #3105

vicuna opened this issue Dec 25, 2001 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@vicuna
Copy link

vicuna commented Dec 25, 2001

Original bug ID: 752
Reporter: administrator
Status: closed
Resolution: not a bug
Priority: normal
Severity: minor
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)

Bug description

Full_Name: Vassili Karpov
Version: 3.04
OS: Linux i386
Submission from: cache1-kh.comex.ru (217.10.35.250)

at +30 otherlibs/num/nat.mli:
val length_nat: nat -> int
val length_nat : nat -> int

Its interesting that this actually allocates 2 size_addr entries of module
storage instead of just one, i hit this with shared patched OCaml(which uses
mixed by position(for current module) and by name(for outsiders) global storage
access).

Anyway the problem is two fold:
a) redundant declaration (not a bug)
b) unneeded allocation (bug for shared patched OCaml)

@vicuna vicuna closed this as completed Jan 11, 2002
@vicuna vicuna added the bug label Mar 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant