You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original bug ID: 837 Reporter: administrator Status: closed Resolution: not a bug Priority: normal Severity: minor Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
and the standard library modules are now not labeled, instead
labeled versions of some of these modules are provided.
but then I find
val set_all_formatter_output_functions :
out:(string -> int -> int -> unit) -> flush:(unit -> unit) ->
newline:(unit -> unit) -> spaces:(int -> unit) -> unit
val pp_set_all_formatter_output_functions :
formatter -> out:(string -> int -> int -> unit) -> flush:(unit -> unit) ->
newline:(unit -> unit) -> spaces:(int -> unit) -> unit
in format.mli.
These left-over are intentional. This is typically a case were labels
can avoid errors, and (thanks to the new labeling rules) leaving
labels would not break existing programs. It just appeared to be the
only case so clear-cut.
Did it break anything in your code ?
Jacques Garrigue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original bug ID: 837
Reporter: administrator
Status: closed
Resolution: not a bug
Priority: normal
Severity: minor
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
From: tews@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de
These left-over are intentional. This is typically a case were labels
can avoid errors, and (thanks to the new labeling rules) leaving
labels would not break existing programs. It just appeared to be the
only case so clear-cut.
Did it break anything in your code ?
Jacques Garrigue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: