Browse thread
Re: [English only, sorry] O'Labl hands off the standard library?
- Jun P. Furuse
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jun P. Furuse <Jun.Furuse@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [English only, sorry] O'Labl hands off the standard library? |
> Hi. I'm quite intrigued by the polymorphic variant type system
> extension in O'Labl and I would like to try it; but I thoroughly
> dislike the other parts of O'Labl (labels and optionals). Is there a
> way to apply just parts of the Ocaml -> O'Labl patch to get just the
> polymorphic variants and nothing else? I realize that nothing forces
> me to actually _use_ labels and optionals, except --- the standard
> library gets labelized! So, I'd be willing to have the entire compiler
> patch applied, if only the library is left alone. Please?
O'Labl without labels ... It is no longer O'Labl ... Anyway, use olabl
or olablc with the -nolabels command line option. With this option,
you do not need to put labels.
% olabl -nolabels
# let x = String.sub;;
val x : string -> pos:int -> len:int -> string = <fun>
# x "aiu" pos: 0 len: 1;;
- : string = "a"
# x "aiu" 0 1;;
- : string = "a"
# x we: "aiu" are: 0 ignored: 1;;
- : string = "a"
Still the types are with labels , but O'Labl ignores them. Of course,
you lose the free order applications and the optional arguments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jun P. Furuse Jun.Furuse@inria.fr
INRIA
Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique