Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Re: Non-destructive record update??
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Pascal Brisset <brisset@r...>
Subject: Re: Non-destructive record update??
Pierre Weis writes:
> We propose the notation {expr with label1 = e1; lable2 = e2 ... } to
> mean the record returned by the expression expr with fields label1,
> label2, ... set to values e1, e2, ...

 Is it a good idea to ``hide'' the copy of one object behind a simple
keyword ? I think such operation should be more explicit. Something with
the 'new' keyword like

	new expr with {label1 = e1; lable2 = e2 ... }

makes things a bit clearer.

 Anyway, a function Record.copy would be enough !

--Pascal