Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Re: Garbage collection qustion
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Damien Doligez <Damien.Doligez@i...>
Subject: Re: Garbage collection qustion

>From: Ohad Rodeh <orodeh@cs.huji.ac.il>

>[allocation: minor=0.0M (4% promoted) (direct major=0K)|collections:
>minor=1, major=0, compact=0|words: 63488 (0% live) (1 chunks)|blocks: 120
>(99% live) (largest_free=62878)]
[...]
>[allocation: minor=2.7M (0% promoted) (direct major=0K)|collections:
>minor=91, major=21, compact=3|words: 63488 (1% live) (1 chunks)|blocks:
>255 (99% live) (largest_free=62343)]

I think you are misinterpreting the numbers.  The relevant variable
here is heap_words, which doesn't increase at all.

Does the size of your process (as reported by ps) actually increase ?

-- Damien