[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 1998-07-02 (02:19) |
From: | Damien Doligez <Damien.Doligez@i...> |
Subject: | Re: Garbage collection qustion |
>From: Ohad Rodeh <orodeh@cs.huji.ac.il> >[allocation: minor=0.0M (4% promoted) (direct major=0K)|collections: >minor=1, major=0, compact=0|words: 63488 (0% live) (1 chunks)|blocks: 120 >(99% live) (largest_free=62878)] [...] >[allocation: minor=2.7M (0% promoted) (direct major=0K)|collections: >minor=91, major=21, compact=3|words: 63488 (1% live) (1 chunks)|blocks: >255 (99% live) (largest_free=62343)] I think you are misinterpreting the numbers. The relevant variable here is heap_words, which doesn't increase at all. Does the size of your process (as reported by ps) actually increase ? -- Damien