Browse thread
Let rec trouble
- Christopher Oliver
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 1998-07-27 (18:31) |
From: | Christopher Oliver <oliver@f...> |
Subject: | Let rec trouble |
I'm having trouble with the syntax of let rec. Consider the following program for computing Van der Waerden's bound: open Num open Nat open Big_int open Ratio let rec n k l = let rec m i = if i =/ Int 0 then Int 1 else Int 2 */ (m (pred_num i)) */ (n (k **/ (m (pred_num i))) (pred_num l)) in if l =/ Int 2 then succ_num k else m k;; print_string (string_of_num (n (Int 3) (Int 3)));; I would like to restrict the lexical scope of 'n' by replacing the first double semicolon with 'in.' I nest m precisely to capture k and l in m's lexical environment. Why is this use forbidden? I.e. Why shouldn't I be able to write: let rec n k l = let rec m i = if i =/ Int 0 then Int 1 else Int 2 */ (m (pred_num i)) */ (n (k **/ (m (pred_num i))) (pred_num l)) in if l =/ Int 2 then succ_num k else m k in print_string (string_of_num (n (Int 3) (Int 3)));; I would prefer not to define a top level symbol, and this seems an inconsistancy. Am I missing something? -- Christopher Oliver Traverse Internet Systems Coordinator 223 Grandview Pkwy, Suite 108 oliver@traverse.net Traverse City, Michigan, 49684 let magic f = fun x -> x and more_magic n f = fun x -> f ((n f) x);;