Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Types construits et interface de modules
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Sven LUTHER <LUTHERSV@e...>
Subject: Types construits et interface de modules
Bonjour, ...
Hello, ...

est -il possible de faire la chose suivante en caml ?
is it possible to do something like that in caml ?

module type T = sig
	type t = A | B
	end
module A = struct
	type t = A | B
	end
module B = struct
	type t = A | B | C
	end

module F (M:T) = struct
	type t = M.t
	end

module MA = F (A)
module MB = F (B)

cela ne marche pas car les types t = A | B et t = A | B | C sont
differents
this don't work because the types t = A | B and t = A | B | C are
different

cependant il est possible de faire :

module type T = sig
	type t
	val a : t
	val b : t
	end

module A = struct
	type t = A | B
	let a = A
	let b = B
	end

module B = struct
	type t = A | B | C
	let a = A
	let b = B
	let c = C
	end

module F (M:T) = struct
	type t = M.t
	let a = M.a
	let b = M.b
	end

module MA = F (A)
module MB = F (B)

en, quoi les constructeurs de types sont-ils differents des fonctions ?
Ils ne sont pas propres a chaque type (en effet dans type t = A | B type
t' = A | C, t'.A ecrase t.A).
Il serait interressant de pouvoir definir automatiquement les
constructeurs dans l'interface du module.

in what are the type constuctors different from function symbols ?
they don't belong only to the corresponding type, but to the whole
module.
it would be nice to be able to define also the type constructors in the
interface of a module.

module A = struct
	type t = A |B
	end 

aurrais le type :
would have the following type :

sig type t val A : t val B : t end

Est ce que cela pose des probleme grave, ou ne s'agit-il que de sucre
syntaxique autour de l'implementation actuelle ?

Would this bring serious problems, or is it just syntaxic sugar over the
actual state of things ?


Amicalement,

Sven LUTHER