Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
RE: Functional composition operator?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Anton Moscal <msk@p...>
Subject: RE: Functional composition operator?
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Andrew Kay wrote:

> From: John Whitley <whitley@cse.buffalo.edu>
> > is there a consensus for choice of infix composition operator?  
> 
> In the end we settled on >> and << for forward and reverse
> composition respectively, satisfying the equations:
> 
>     (f << g) x = f (g x) = (g >> f) x

In camlp4 << and >> are used as quotes for invocation of quotation
expander. Your proposals will interfere with camlp4. I propose <<< 
and >>> (this also leads to problem with camlp4, but this issue can be
solved).

Regards,
Anton