[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Anton Moscal <msk@p...> |
| Subject: | RE: Functional composition operator? |
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Andrew Kay wrote: > From: John Whitley <whitley@cse.buffalo.edu> > > is there a consensus for choice of infix composition operator? > > In the end we settled on >> and << for forward and reverse > composition respectively, satisfying the equations: > > (f << g) x = f (g x) = (g >> f) x In camlp4 << and >> are used as quotes for invocation of quotation expander. Your proposals will interfere with camlp4. I propose <<< and >>> (this also leads to problem with camlp4, but this issue can be solved). Regards, Anton