On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Pierre Weis wrote:

> > 	Why is there no creation function which does not take a default
> > value for filling the array?

Perhaps the solution is to have an improved implementation of the 'a
option type, where a NULL pointer would mean "None" and anything else
would be the element of type 'a.

Is there anything wrong with this approach? [except that it could break
some interfaced C code that relies on NULL pointers in "private" types..]

Regards,
D. Monniaux