Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: "while" with condition at end?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 1999-02-09 (08:51)
From: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@i...>
Subject: Re: "while" with condition at end?
> Hello!
> I have just found out that there is no loop construct that checks the
> termination condition at the end of the block. Is there some special
> reason to this?
> I'd like to write something like e.g.
>   do
>     ();
>     ...;
>   while (some_condition);
> The only work-around is to either double the code and execute it once
> before a "normal" while-loop (not elegant). The other option is to put
> the block into a unit-function (a bit less efficient) and use it once
> before and than in the loop (also not very elegant).
> A construct of this kind would probably make the imperative features
> more complete.
> Best regards,
> Markus Mottl
> -- 
> Markus Mottl,,

The introduction of a ``do ... while ...'' construct would introduce
ambiguities in the Caml grammar. It would be preferable to
introduce a new keyword for the new kind of loop, for instance


Or may be better, just change the keyword ``while'' into the keyword
``until'' to reflect the symetry between the two syntactic constructs
for imperative loops:

until cond

For the time being, there is a simple workaround (admittedly not as
nice as desirable): merge the ``actions'' and the ``condition'' into a
single sequence within a while loop with an empty body. In effect,

until cond

is equivalent to

while actions; cond do () done

Alternatively, you may define your loop via a recursive function:

let rec repeat_loop () =
 if not cond then repeat_loop () in
repeat_loop ()

Best regards,

Pierre Weis

INRIA, Projet Cristal,,