[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Thorsten Ohl <ohl@h...> |
| Subject: | Re: Non generalizable type of constants? |
Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr> writes: > If you insist at abstracting the type Groupe.t, I do, because this way I can hide details of different groups from free constructions over them ... > I'm not aware of any solution to your problem, except turning your > unit_bad identifier into a function let unit_bad () = A.atom (M.unit). Syntactically, It's not pretty, but I can live with it. I shied away from this because I was not sure about the result of module F = FreeRing ( some ring ...) compare (F.unit_bad ()) (F.unit_bad ()) in this case. Does O'Caml guarantee that the expression will always evaluate to 0? [ Currently it appears to, but can I depend on it? ] > More generally, what you call constants are computed values, even if > the computation is simple in your case, hence we have the general > problem of references. I had this confused, thanks for pointing it out! -Thorsten -- Thorsten Ohl, Physics Department, TU Darmstadt -- ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de http://heplix.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de/~ohl/ [<=== PGP public key here]