Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Break under Windows NT
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: Break under Windows NT
> Is it true that under the Windows NT version of OCaml there's no easy way of
> sending the equivalent of a SIGINT to a OCaml process and have OCaml raise
> an exception?

As far as I know, Win32 has no equivalent to Unix signals (i.e. the
ability for a process to interrupt asynchronously another process).

For "console" applications, the C library implements some notion of
signals (for ANSI C compatibility), but SIGINT is only generated when
the user types ctrl-C or ctrl-break at the keyboard, or when the
program sends SIGINT to itself; it cannot be generated from another

A classic alternative to signals is to use multiple threads: one
thread synchronously waits for some external notification, then fakes
a pending signal condition in the other thread that is running the
Caml code.  However, Caml threads do not have (yet) the ability to
raise exceptions in other threads, so one has to implement this
solution in C.  If you tell me in more details what you're trying to
achieve, maybe I could send you some sample code.

> Or have I missed something?  I need to be able to
> asynchronously break long running computations under NT.  BTW I'm also using
> OCamlTK.

OCamlTk programs are not console-only applications, and thus have an
event loop that runs periodically.  This adds more opportunities for
implementing inter-process notification, via periodic polling or
by posting special events on the application's message queue; however,
I haven't looked into this in details.

- Xavier Leroy