On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 10:24:52AM +0100, Dave Berry wrote:
> At 19:53 19/04/99 +0200, Pierre Weis wrote:
> >You are right, but you know, nowadays, it's a kind of a religious war:
> >you must have been baptized under the GPL to be declared a ``free''
> >man (sorry, I meant software).
> 
> I find the most useful definition is not "free software", but "Open Source
> software".  This has a broader definition than just GNU.  If you look at

which is just the debian free software guidelines (DFSG) from where it
originated, look also at :

http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines

(Another case where proper credit is not always given to the right persons ...)
	
Friendly,

Sven LUTHER