[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Francois Pottier <Francois.Pottier@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: Go for ultimate localization! |
> Localizing the language is not that difficult, but it would involve > exposing the abstract syntax to the localizer, and the localizer would > have the difficult task of rewriting the parser. I would like to point out that this has been done by Apple in their AppleScript scripting language. It looks cool at first sight, but it means that textual programs are no longer portable, since the machine you're moving to may not use the same language as yours. So, only the (binary) abstract syntax tree is portable, which is (IMHO) a very bad thing, since maintaining compatibility across versions of the language becomes very difficult. -- François Pottier Francois.Pottier@inria.fr http://pauillac.inria.fr/~fpottier/