Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: Stdlib regularity
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 1999-10-08 (14:14)
From: Matías Giovannini <matias@k...>
Subject: Re: Stdlib regularity
Markus Mottl wrote:
> >   I have used OCaml extensively in the past few years, and I've had
> > some misgivings about the CAML standard library argument ordering. It
> > is a little bit confusing and not standard. For example:
> Although the standard library is quite ok, there are some (minor)
> inconsistencies. What concerns my wishes for it, I'd love to see more
> features (= functions or even modules).

Yes! Yes! I always begin my Caml code by writing iota, and I wish it
were included in the standard library. It's silly simple, and imprescindible.

let iota n =
    let rec aux l n =
        if n > 0 then aux (n::l) (n-1) else l
    in aux [] n

And then a "functional for" loop looks like (fun i -> ...) (iota n)

(Incidentaly, the name "iota" comes from APL, and stands for the
"Initial natural Interval".)

I got your message. I couldn't read it. It was a cryptogram.
-- Laurie Anderson