[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | chet@w... |
| Subject: | Re: speed versus C |
The Caml XML parser I wrote was competitive with XML4C (slightly faster), and blew XML4J out of the water (10x). This was using the native-code compiler. The Caml XSL processor I wrote handily beat Java XSL processors. My guess is that if you're thinking of writing in C, and you don't need low-level access to real memory and such, you will find that CAML is more than fast enough. --chet--