[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Don Syme <dsyme@m...> |
| Subject: | Record typing question |
The typing rule for record overriding seems slightly more restrictive than
necessary, though I can imagine this is because it was simplest to implement
it this way. e.g.
# type 'a foo = { a: 'a; b: int };;
type 'a foo = { a: 'a; b:int }
# let f x = {x with a=1 };;
val f : int foo -> int foo = <fun>
Why doesn't f have type 'a foo -> int foo??
It's not a big deal, since I can always construct a whole new record term,
but there may be an easy fix. BTW adding record overriding in 2.02 has
saved me _heaps_ of time, and made it much more productive to use records.
Thanks!
Don