Browse thread
Re: Interpreter vs hardware threads
- David Gurr
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Gurr <gurr@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: Interpreter vs hardware threads |
> > (Of course, one could always ask the ocaml team that won the ICFP > > competition in such spectacular fashion to knock off an > > ocaml-to-event-driven-FSM compiler ...) > > I'm not sure that OCaml is the best input language for generating > FSMs, but, yes, generating FSMs from a high-level concurrent language > is an excellent approach. You get both ultimate execution speed and a > readable, maintainable description of the program. Have a look for > instance at Esterel (another glorious INRIA product :-)) > > - Xavier Leroy > And Lucid-Synchronie? Any thoughts on JoCaml with Cilk-like threads?