[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jan Brosius <jan.brosius@v...> |
| Subject: | to have labels or not |
Hi, I am looking around to have a good , free and very easy language , portable and so on, producing fast code. Objective Caml was and still is for me a serious candidate among the many free portable languages on the net. I realise that it is not up to me to enforce a decision . I also realize that credits always should be given to the implementors and France's research institute INRIA. My personal choice is not to use labels at all because it makes the readable code too big, it is better I think to use meaningful words and within comments to clarify the types of the functions. I think I would never use the "label on " option. function x -> .. could be shortened by : \x ->..... I think and the use of [`a] instead of `a list and the use of list comprensions as in Haskell could shorten the readable code and maintain readability. friendly et amicalement Jan Brosius