Browse thread
mixing Ocaml with another GC-ed language
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: Interpreter vs hardware threads |
Xavier Leroy wrote: > I'm not sure that OCaml is the best input language for generating > FSMs, but, yes, generating FSMs from a high-level concurrent language > is an excellent approach. You get both ultimate execution speed and a > readable, maintainable description of the program. Have a look for > instance at Esterel (another glorious INRIA product :-)) OK. Thanks for the explanation. 'Threads' are typically delayed waiting for 'any' event, and occasionally, a specific event (response to a request). -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net