[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | William Chesters <williamc@p...> |
| Subject: | RE: Interpreter vs hardware threads |
Edwin Young writes: > From: William Chesters [mailto:williamc@paneris.org] > > Judging by Max's .sig he's doing embedded telecoms boxes, > > something like a GSM HLR which juggles many thousands of concurrent > > transactions in some ghastly protocol or other. > > If that's the case, perhaps he should investigate Erlang. Since it was > designed by Ericsson specifically for embedded telephony apps, it would seem > an ideal fit. It does indeed support thousands of concurrent threads > (internal to the interpreter rather than OS-based). Absolutely, and Erlang looked great to me, except (ironically) I couldn't help feeling that the lack of imperative data structures was going to be a bit of a pain. However they were apparently going to fix that.