Browse thread
Re: Syntax for label
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David.Mentre@i... |
| Subject: | labels & ocaml 3 & co. |
Nicolas barnier <barnier@recherche.enac.fr> writes: > I'm quite tired with all this polemic. so do I. > Moreover, two compile modes are not a very good idea for obvious > portability reasons. I agree. > So I think we should switch to a single modern mode because labels in > modern mode are useful and simple (at least in Labltk), Agree. > and withdraw labels in the standard library because they're often a > pain (and the lib is small enough to learn without the need for > labels). Agree. But another proposal : why not use *only optional labels* in the standard library? Therefore : - traditionnal (classic) caml users are not forced to use labels at all (even if they are available) - label (modern) caml users can use them freely, with arguments commutativity and so on > We would then keep labels an orthogonal improvment. I think everybody agree on this (only? :-) point. Sincerely, david -- David.Mentre@irisa.fr -- http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/ Opinions expressed here are only mine.