Browse thread
Re: Syntax for label
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David.Mentre@i... |
| Subject: | Re: labels & ocaml 3 & co. |
David.Mentre@irisa.fr (David Mentré) writes: > Agree. But another proposal : why not use *only optional labels* in the > standard library? Oops. I think I've confused optionnal *arguments* and optionnal *labels*. Sorry. So the best way is probably to avoid using labels in stdlib at all. BTW, Jacques Garrigue, is it mandatory to have labels to exploit label commutativity? For example, an application without labels would be considered as a standard ocaml2 application, whereas application with labels would be an ocaml3-modern label-commutative application. If this could be possible, we could combine best of both worlds (ie no labels or commutative-labels for stdlib). Best regards, d. -- David.Mentre@irisa.fr -- http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/ Opinions expressed here are only mine.