Browse thread
Syntax Discussions and Caml Philosophy
- David McClain
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David McClain <dmcclain@a...> |
| Subject: | Syntax Discussions and Caml Philosophy |
I have been reading the past messages about label syntax with some degree of interest... I am not expert enough in their use to make any comments regarding them. But I will echo the experience of a heavy user of Caml in saying that I have been quite pleased with the "orthogonality" of syntactic components. I find that Caml is first among languages (and beyond Lisp) that permit drastic and radical changes to underlying modules of very large programs without introducing unwanted side effect propagation. This amazing property has enabled a tenfold increase in my own productivity. Whatever the outcome of these discussions, I do hope that these orthogonality goals, and the other simple "properties" of the language can be maintained. This compiler is too elegant and useful to destroy with the introduction of intrusive features... David McClain, Sr. Scientist Raytheon Systems Co. Tucson, AZ