Browse thread
Re: Syntax for label
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Sven LUTHER <luther@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 09:50:49AM +0100, Pascal Brisset wrote: > Pierre Weis writes: > > For all these reasons, I would suggest to carefully use labels into > > the standard libraries: > > > > -- remove labels from higher-order functional > > -- remove redundant labels: when no ambiguity can occur you need not > > to add a label. > > -- use labels when typechecking ambiguity is evident (for instance > > when there are two or more parameters with the same type). > > Would it be possible to organize a vote for removing all labels from the > standard library ? I thought that all labels added to the standard library are only there because they can be added in a totally transparent way of doing things, because a labeled function can be used unlabeled if you like it. Friendly, Sven LUTHER