Browse thread
Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?
-
Markus Mottl
-
Brian Rogoff
- John Max Skaller
- John Max Skaller
- John Max Skaller
-
Brian Rogoff
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry? |
Brian Rogoff wrote: > Absolutely! This is a point I have been making for a while, that the point > of comparison should be Perl, Python, and even Java. OCaml performance is > excellent when compared to these languages. I don't agree with this. The reason is: ocaml has a much nicer type system than C++. I would rather write code in it, than C++. So I'd like it to be faster than C++ as well as nicer :-) > (3) The OCaml error messaging, which makes worse the problem most people > already have with the unfamiliar type system This can be improved with time I imagine. [Error handling is a lot of work] -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net