Browse thread
Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?
- Markus Mottl
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <mottl@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry? |
> For me, it has deficiency as a scripting language: interactive > (command prompt) use is clumbsy because gnu-readline isn't integrated: > no history or editing. [This should be easy to fix: there's some code > in the Vyper.sourceforge.net repository which might be adapted.] I have already nearly forgotten about this problem: I use the "ile"-tool (input line editor - some age old piece of software) as "wrapper" around the OCaml-toplevel, which gives me all these nice features back. Works with just about any terminal program! For those of you who don't have it yet, I have put a link to the source-tarball into Gerd Stolpmann's link database (name: ILE): http://www.npc.de/ocaml/linkdb After compilation, just start it with "ile ocaml" (even better: assign an alias!) Especially useful for teaching/demonstration purposes... Best regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl, mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at, http://miss.wu-wien.ac.at/~mottl