Browse thread
RE: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Max Skaller <maxs@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry? |
Vitaly Lugovsky wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Francois Pottier wrote: > > > May I advocate Jean-Christophe Filliātre's excellent literate > > programming tool, ocamlweb? > > > > http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr/ocamlweb/ > > > > It nicely turns your O'Caml source code into a TeX document, > > including an identifier index. Comments are expected to contain > > TeX source. > > But stupid "industry" don't like TeX. :( > They wants HTML or somthing like that. Is there any HTML output > formatter for ocamlweb? Industry knows nothing about literate > programming, as well as about many other progressive technologies. Industry is not stupid, it is simply governed by different motives. I'm using a) ocaml -- an advanced programming language b) interscript -- an advanced literate programming tool in my job. -- John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd] mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au -- at work mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au -- at home