[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas GEORGE <nicolas.george@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: Dynamic link |
Le vendredi 21 avril 2000, Jerome Vouillon a écrit : > Actually, if you are concerned about the size of a custom runtime, it > is much simpler to patch the OCaml makefiles so that the standard > library and the special libraries are built as shared library. I agree with that, as long as you are root on your computer, to install the new "fat" runtime each time you add a new library. > API for dynamically loading C libraries at execution time (rather than In my view, this is a quite different issue. (And I don't see immediatly how to do that type safely) > I don't think you need to consider builtin primitives in a special > way: just consider the runtime as another shared library. At this time, I am not at ease with the compiler/run-time code enough to make so wide changes. But the structure of my patch allows that almost without changes: I simply builtins primitives into the symbols database, and as the symbol is already initialized, it does not load this fake library. > You should definitively do that. And I think it's easy. I will try, but I have others parallel projects (I have written a binding for the curses library, and I must then build on top of that a high-level widget system). -- Sorry for my horrible English.