Browse thread
Newsgroup for Caml?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <mottl@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: Newsgroup for Caml? |
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > > Instead of creating a new one, the more imperialistically minded among us > > might choose to seize power over there... > > Well, the problem is that comp.lang.ml is a moderated newsgroup, and > that it is directly tied to the SML mailing list. I see no point in > changing that. I was only joking ;-) But in any case: traffic is really low there. I could imagine that it would be beneficial for the ML-communities not to split up too much. People look for newsgroups with high traffic, because this improves the chance of discussing a topic of their interest. Additionally, people would see that there are several ML-flavours around, in other terms: the general style of ML is obviously a reasonable one to adopt/learn. A beginner will probably find out more easily about advantages and drawbacks of the specific flavours and implementations if he has a newsgroup where both sides can argue. Although a separate newsgroup for Caml would still have a chance of thriving, some "cultural" intermixture might lead to fruitful (and hopefully flameless ;) discussions. Pierre's proposal to still have a list for implementation specific suggestions seems reasonable. One could cross-post messages from the maintainers to the newsgroup. > Also I'm not sure that people who don't like newsgroups would really > enjoy reading such a non-moderated caml-list, with the flame-wars and > spam one can expect. Mailing lists, too, can contain flame wars - but here you cannot "escape" so easily, because it clutters your mailbox. > I know it's always hard to distinguish, but for me news and mailing > lists are complementary, and I would prefer to have mailing lists > directly pour in my inbox, rather than have to discriminate them to > avoid overflow. I personally can live with both alternatives. The question is whether Pierre wants to become a full-time list moderator or prefers to do some research... Best regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl, mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at, http://miss.wu-wien.ac.at/~mottl