Browse thread
Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml
-
Michael Donat
-
Thorsten Ohl
-
Vitaly Lugovsky
- Markus Mottl
-
Vitaly Lugovsky
-
Thorsten Ohl
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <mottl@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: Signatures (was: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode) |
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Vitaly Lugovsky wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Thorsten Ohl wrote: > > Even better would be a fixed point condition that would allow to print > > a warning message: ``The sources have been modified, you can do > > anything you want, but don't blame me or the results.'' > > But it don't need a core support from OCaml - you just can use MD5 checksum > or something like this.... Which is already available under OCaml, anyway: let md5 = Digest.file "foo" in ... Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl, mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at, http://miss.wu-wien.ac.at/~mottl