Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
RE: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Max Skaller <maxs@i...>
Subject: Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial ObjectionTo O'Caml
Brent Fulgham wrote:
> 
> > BTW: people here read books. An English Ocaml book
> > would provide very strong support for industrial use.
> >
> I'm in the process of reading "The Functional Approach
> to Programming" (Cousineau & Mauny).  This book is not
> strictly OCaml 

That's part of the problem. People here are short of time:
while education in functional programming techniques is 
useful, a description of Ocaml is more pointed: remember,
Ocaml is _not_ a functional programming language, but an
Algol like language with functional, procedural, and object
oriented components... just like C++. 

In ocaml, the 'orientation' is more functional, but the biggest
obstacle isn't the functional paradigm as such, but the actual
concrete syntax used.

-- 
John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd]
mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au      -- at work
mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au  -- at home