Browse thread
Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml
-
Michael Donat
-
Thorsten Ohl
-
Vitaly Lugovsky
-
Markus Mottl
-
Thorsten Ohl
- Vitaly Lugovsky
-
Thorsten Ohl
-
Markus Mottl
-
Vitaly Lugovsky
-
Thorsten Ohl
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: Signatures (was: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode) |
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Thorsten Ohl wrote: > One can play games with MD5 and a `Signatures' module in the Makefile, > but this is not 100%ly secure, because the code could be compiled by > hand, without updating the checksums. > > Or am I missing something here? We can use a script wrapper to compiler itself, like it does ocamlfind. And so, we don't need to change the compiler code... -- V.S.Lugovsky aka Mauhuur (http://ontil.ihep.su/~vsl) (UIN=45482254)