Browse thread
RE: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml
- Brent Fulgham
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brent Fulgham <brent.fulgham@x...> |
| Subject: | RE: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml |
> > I'm in the process of reading "The Functional Approach > > to Programming" (Cousineau & Mauny). This book is not > > strictly OCaml > > That's part of the problem. People here are short of time: > while education in functional programming techniques is > useful, a description of Ocaml is more pointed: remember, > Ocaml is _not_ a functional programming language, but an > Algol like language with functional, procedural, and object > oriented components... just like C++. > > In ocaml, the 'orientation' is more functional, but the biggest > obstacle isn't the functional paradigm as such, but the actual > concrete syntax used. > Yes. An O'Reilly-style "Nutshell" handbook would be quite nice. However, I have not seen such an animal. I'm afraid the C&M book is all that's available for those of us whose French skills are sub-par. It will probably take a killer app to get such a book published... -Brent